Vestibulum cursus pharetra aliquet. Nam euismod vulputate quam, sed dignissim diam fringilla at. Donec nec augue diam. Vestibulum semper eget lacus sed malesuada. Duis dictum urna mi, quis porta est rhoncus id. Proin suscipit vel augue at elementum. In gravida felis in ligula suscipit, in dictum tortor consequat. In porta varius varius. Pellentesque cursus lorem sit amet massa aliquet viverra. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Donec non auctor massa. Curabitur ac lacus sit amet tellus sodales mattis.
Praesent nisl lorem, volutpat ut ornare quis, auctor suscipit ante. Praesent dolor nunc, congue quis aliquam non, volutpat id ex. Praesent vehicula enim orci, id tincidunt ex interdum nec. Nullam feugiat nisi vitae justo vehicula dictum. Maecenas pellentesque mi dui, id imperdiet quam fringilla iaculis. Suspendisse et risus quis ex ornare faucibus non nec augue. Nam eget semper eros. Vivamus euismod eu est sed malesuada. Fusce tempor lobortis suscipit. Nulla sit amet tellus in ligula iaculis condimentum. Cras vel diam eu massa vulputate sollicitudin.
Physical components | Benchmark indicator | Nairobi | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Public health - Waste collection | 1.1 | Waste collection coverage (% households) | 52 |
|
1.2 | Waste Captured by the solid waste management and recycling system (% wt.) | 60 |
|
|
1C | Quality of the waste collection and street cleaning service (%) | 29 |
|
|
Environmental control - disposal | 2 | Control treatment and/or disposal (% wt.) | 0 |
|
2E | Quality of environmental protection in waste treatment and disposal | 0 |
|
|
Resource value - 3Rs: Reduce, reuse, recycling | 3 | Recycling rate (% wt.) | 30 |
|
3R | Quality of 3Rs - reduce, reuse, recycle (%) | 25 |
|
|
Governance factors | Benchmark indicator | Nairobi | ||
Degree of user and provider inclusivity | 4U | Degree of user inclusivity (%) | 42 |
|
4P | Degree of provider inclusivity (%) | 55 |
|
|
Degree of financial sustainability | 5F | Degree of financial sustainability (%) | 50 |
|
Sound institutions and proactive policies | 6N | Adequacy of national framework for solid waste management (SWM) (%) | 54 |
|
6L | Degree of local institutional coherence (%) | 42 |
|